Supreme Court Rules In Favor of Washington Redskins Name Trademark

Written by Will Brinson at CBS Sports.com

The Washington Redskins are not likely to lose their legal ability to use their controversial name over trademark issues following Monday’s ruling from the Supreme Court. And team owner Daniel Snyder is reportedly thrilled by the ruling, according to the franchise’s lawyer.

The case is pretty fascinating: an Asian-American rock band named “The Slants” had been denied a trademark in 2011 by the United States Patent Office because the name of the band was considered disparaging and violated the 1946 Lanham Trademark Act, which did not allow trademarks that “may disparage . . . persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs or national symbols, or bring them into contempt, or disrepute” to be registered.

The band sued, and for the past seven years has been waiting on a decision. The Supreme Court issued that decision Monday, with Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. basically saying that disparagement is subjective.

“That is viewpoint discrimination in the sense relevant here: Giving offense is a viewpoint,” Alito wrote, according to the Washington PostAdditionally, Alito said that refusing a trademark based on someone taking offense cuts directly against the First Amendment. “Speech may not be banned on the ground that it expresses ideas that offend,” Alito wrote.

This is big news for the Redskins because the United States Patent Office, which handles the registration of trademarks and patents, has previously canceled the Redskins trademark of the name. Additionally, a federal judge ordered the cancellation of the Redskins name a year later.

To continue reading this article, click here.

×

Eye Popper Digital is the premier digital advertising technology and solutions firm. We’ve developed ad units that run across both desktop and mobile driving high-impact viewability, engagement and revenue for publishers and advertisers.

Learn more about us.